JAAOS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poss, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poss, R
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Vol 1, Issue 1, 18-23
Copyright © 1993 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons


Journal Article

Total Joint Replacement: Optimizing Patient Expectations

R Poss

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston. Rehabilitation of the patient who has undergone total hip or knee replacement embraces many facets of care, including prevention of complications, patient education, and a program of gradual resumption of normal functions. This program may be divided into three phases. In the perioperative phase, elimination of factors that contribute to morbidity will facilitate resumption of physical activities. In the interim phase (the first year following surgery), the patient's desire to return to full activities must be tempered by the goal of preserving for the longest possible time the mechanical-biologic construct of the joint replacement. Although a final functional result is usually achieved in the first 2 to 3 years following surgery, the patient must be followed up indefinitely. During this third phase of long-term assessment, the question of whether total joint arthroplasty was a success must be answered by the surgeon, by the patient, and by society.

Rehabilitation of the patient who has undergone total hip or knee replacement embraces many facets of care, including prevention of complications, patient education, and a program of gradual resumption of normal functions. This program may be divided into three phases. In the perioperative phase, elimination of factors that contribute to morbidity will facilitate resumption of physical activities. In the interim phase (the first year following surgery), the patient's desire to return to full activities must be tempered by the goal of preserving for the longest possible time the mechanical-biologic construct of the joint replacement. Although a final functional result is usually achieved in the first 2 to 3 years following surgery, the patient must be followed up indefinitely. During this third phase of long-term assessment, the question of whether total joint arthroplasty was a success must be answered by the surgeon, by the patient, and by society.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.