JAAOS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Acad Orthop Surg, Vol 11, No 2, March/April 2003, 109-119.
© 2003 the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cornell, C. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cornell, C. N.

Internal Fracture Fixation in Patients With Osteoporosis

Charles N. Cornell, MD

Dr. Cornell is Associate Attending Orthopaedic Surgeon, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.

Reprint requests: Dr. Cornell, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021.

Because of the decreased holding power of plate-and-screw fixation in osteoporotic bone fractures, internal fixation can have a high failure rate, ranging from 10% to 25%. Screws placed into cortical bone have better resistance to pullout than do those placed into adjacent trabecular bone. Plates should not be used to bridge unstable regions of bony comminution in osteoporotic patients. Fixation stability is optimized by securing stable bone contact across the fracture site and by placing screws both as close to and as far from the fracture as possible. Intentional shortening can improve stability and load sharing of the fracture construct. Structural bone graft or other types of fillers can be used to fill voids when comminution prevents stable contact. Load-sharing fixation devices such as the sliding hip screw, intramedullary nail, antiglide plate, and tension band constructs are better alternatives for osteoporotic metaphyseal locations. Proper planning is essential for improved fracture fixation in this high-risk patient group.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
K. Vander Have, J. Herrera, R. Kohen, and M. Karunakar
The Use of Locked Plating in Skeletally Immature Patients
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., August 1, 2008; 16(8): 436 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
S. J. Nho, R. H. Brophy, J. U. Barker, C. N. Cornell, and J. D. MacGillivray
Management of Proximal Humeral Fractures Based on Current Literature
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2007; 89(suppl_3): 44 - 58.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
S. J. Nho, R. H. Brophy, J. U. Barker, C. N. Cornell, and J. D. MacGillivray
Innovations in the Management of Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., January 1, 2007; 15(1): 12 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
M. J. Gardner, M. H. Griffith, D. Demetrakopoulos, R. H. Brophy, A. Grose, D. L. Helfet, and D. G. Lorich
Hybrid Locked Plating of Osteoporotic Fractures of the Humerus
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2006; 88(9): 1962 - 1967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
A. Moroni, C. Faldini, F. Pegreffi, A. Hoang-Kim, and S. Giannini
Osteoporotic Pertrochanteric Fractures Can Be Successfully Treated with External Fixation
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2005; 87(suppl_2): 42 - 51.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
N. Hebela, D. G. Smith, and M. A. Keenan
What's New in Orthopaedic Rehabilitation
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2004; 86(11): 2577 - 2581.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.