JAAOS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Acad Orthop Surg, Vol 12, No 1, January/February 2004, 12-20.
© 2004 the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Su, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Di Cesare, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Su, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Di Cesare, P. E.

Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Above Total Knee Replacements

Edward T. Su, MD, Hargovind DeWal, MD and Paul E. Di Cesare, MD

Dr. Su is Resident, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Musculoskeletal Research Center, NYU–Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY. Dr. DeWal is Resident, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Musculoskeletal Research Center, NYU–Hospital for Joint Diseases. Dr. Di Cesare is Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Musculoskeletal Research Center, NYU–Hospital for Joint Diseases.

Reprint requests: Dr. Di Cesare, NYU–Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements can be managed by a variety of methods, including casting, open reduction and internal fixation, external fixation, or revision arthroplasty. Because no single method has emerged as the optimal choice for all such fractures, it is important to understand which options are appropriate for each fracture pattern. Early classification systems focused on displacement as a major indication for either surgical or nonsurgical management. However, recent techniques and current implants have made surgical management preferable for most periprosthetic fractures. Classification based on fracture location can help guide such treatment. Generally, intramedullary nails are best for proximal fractures, fixed-angle devices for fractures originating at the component, and revision arthroplasty for very distal fractures or those with implant loosening.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.