JAAOS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Orthop Surg, Vol 12, No 1, January/February 2004, 28-38.
© 2004 the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeCoster, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pirela-Cruz, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeCoster, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pirela-Cruz, M. A.

Management of Posttraumatic Segmental Bone Defects

Thomas A. DeCoster, MD, Rick J. Gehlert, MD, Elizabeth A. Mikola, MD and Miguel A. Pirela-Cruz, MD

Dr. DeCoster is Professor and Vice Chair, Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM. Dr. Gehlert is Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico. Dr. Mikola is Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico. Dr. Pirela-Cruz is Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Texas Tech University–El Paso, El Paso, TX.

Reprint requests: Dr. DeCoster, University of New Mexico, 2ACC, 2211 Lomas Boulevard NE, Al-buquerque, NM 87131-5296.

Because of difficulty in managing posttraumatic segmental bone defects and the resultant poor outcomes, amputation historically was the preferred treatment. Massive cancellous bone autograft has been the principal alternative to amputation. Primary shortening or use of the adjacent fibula as a graft also has been used to attempt limb salvage. Of more recent methods of management, bone transport with distraction osteogenesis has been suggested as the leading option for defects of 2 to 10 cm, but problems include delayed union at the docking site and prolonged treatment time. Free vascularized bone transfer has been suggested as the leading option for defects of 5 to 12 cm, but hypertrophy of the graft is unreliable and late fracture, common. Bone graft substitutes continue to be developed, but they have not yet reached clinical efficacy for posttraumatic segmental bone defects. Although each of the new techniques has shown some limited success, complications remain common.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. L. K. Tate, T. F. Ritzman, E. Schneider, and U. R. Knothe
Testing of a New One-Stage Bone-Transport Surgical Procedure Exploiting the Periosteum for the Repair of Long-Bone Defects
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2007; 89(2): 307 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
H. J. Seeherman, K. Azari, S. Bidic, L. Rogers, X. J. Li, J. O. Hollinger, and J. M. Wozney
rhBMP-2 Delivered in a Calcium Phosphate Cement Accelerates Bridging of Critical-Sized Defects in Rabbit Radii
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2006; 88(7): 1553 - 1565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.