JAAOS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Orthop Surg, Vol 13, No 1, January/February 2005, 6-17.
© 2005 the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spivak, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spivak, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. G.

Percutaneous Treatment of Vertebral Body Pathology

Jeffrey M. Spivak, MD and Michael G. Johnson, MD

Dr. Spivak is Director, The Hospital for Joint Diseases Spine Center, New York, NY. Dr. Johnson is Assistant Professor, Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, University of Manitoba, Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

Reprint requests: Dr. Spivak, The Hospital for Joint Diseases Spine Center, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003.

Percutaneous vertebral body injection procedures currently are used to stabilize and reinforce weakened or fractured bone resulting from metastatic disease and severe osteoporosis. Both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty can reinforce the structure of a vertebral body and provide pain relief, but the procedures have technical differences. Kyphoplasty improves vertebral height to varying degrees in nearly three quarters of patients. Kyphosis is improved more effectively when the procedure is performed within 3 months from the onset of fracture pain. To date, it is unknown whether vertebroplasty with preprocedure postural reduction can provide similar improvement of deformity. Complications are relatively infrequent with both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Cement leakage from the vertebral body is more likely with vertebroplasty than with kyphoplasty. Leakage is more common in the treatment of pathologic fractures resulting from metastatic disease. Clinical complications caused by cement leakage and neural compression are infrequent. Specific indications for these injection procedures need to be more clearly refined. Long-term outcomes, including the fate of the injected material and the effect on adjacent vertebrae, have yet to be determined.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. K. Shindle, W. Tyler, F. Edobor-Osula, M. J. Gardner, L. Shindle, J. Toro, and J. M. Lane
Unsuspected Lymphoma Diagnosed with Use of Biopsy During Kyphoplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2006; 88(12): 2721 - 2724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
N. A. Manson and F. M. Phillips
Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2006; 88(8): 1862 - 1872.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.