JAAOS sign up for etocs now
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Orthop Surg, Vol 14, No 10, September 2006, S118-S123.
© 2006 the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Camuso, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Camuso, M. R.

Far-Forward Fracture Stabilization: External Fixation Versus Splinting

LCDR Matthew R. Camuso, MD, MC, USNR

Dr. Camuso is Clinical Assistant Professor, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, and Staff Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeon, Navy Trauma Training Center, LAC + USC Medical Center, Los Angeles.

Neither Dr. Camuso nor the department with which he is affiliated has received anything of value from or owns stock in a commercial company or institution related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, the Department of Defense, or the United States Government.

With improvements in body armor, soldiers often survive previously fatal injuries but incur devastating extremity trauma. Orthopaedic and general surgeons in forward-deployed areas must be well-versed in the selection and application of both external fixation and splinting devices in order to best preserve life and limb of the wounded. The surgeon must consider tactical environment, injury severity, injury location, available resources, and his or her own level of experience. Advantages to using external fixation in the field include preventing future injury to the traumatized soft-tissue envelope, reducing the risk of infection, minimizing fracture hemorrhage, providing pain control, and facilitating medical evacuation. Splinting is reserved for closed, low-energy, stable fractures of either the upper or lower extremity and for unstable fractures that are not amenable to battlefield external fixation; because of the risks of compartment syndrome, casts are avoided.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
E. M. Schwechter and K. G. Swan
Raoul Hoffmann and His External Fixator
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2007; 89(3): 672 - 678.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.