JAAOS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Orthop Surg, Vol 14, No 8, August 2006, 499-509.
© 2006 the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeFranco, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeFranco, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, B. M.

The Floating Shoulder

Michael J. DeFranco, MD and Brendan M. Patterson, MD

Dr. DeFranco is Chief Resident, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH. Dr. Patterson is Chairman, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The MetroHealth Center, Cleveland.

None of the following authors or the departments with which they are affiliated has received anything of value from or owns stock in a commercial company or institution related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article: Dr. DeFranco and Dr. Patterson.

Reprint requests: Dr. Patterson, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The MetroHealth Center, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, OH 44109.

The floating shoulder is an uncommon but important injury pattern. Although it is frequently defined as an ipsilateral fracture of the clavicle and scapular neck, recent studies suggest that ligament disruption associated with a scapular neck fracture contributes to the functional equivalent of this injury pattern, with or without an associated clavicle fracture. Determining the specific injury patterns indicates the potential for significant instability, and correlating these patterns with clinical outcome is a challenge. Because the degree of ligament disruption is difficult to assess on radiographs, indications for nonsurgical and surgical management are not well defined. Minimally displaced fractures typically do well with nonsurgical care. However, the degree of fracture displacement and ligament disruption that results in less predictable outcomes after nonsurgical treatment is uncertain, and the indications for surgery can be controversial. Internal fixation of a displaced clavicle fracture restores the contour of the shoulder, regulates soft-tissue tension, and often indirectly reduces the scapular neck fracture. Fixation of both fractures is recommended in certain fracture patterns. Because these controversies cannot be resolved by current evidence, surgeons must choose an individualized approach based on an understanding of the pathoanatomy and personal experience.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.