JAAOS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Acad Orthop Surg, Vol 16, No suppl_1, July 2008, S86-S93.
© 2008 the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by Manley, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by Manley, M. T.

How do alternative bearing surfaces influence wear behavior?

Ian C. Clarke, PhD and Michael T. Manley, PhD

Dr. Clarke is Professor in Research, Peterson Research Center, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA. Dr. Manley is Academic Director, Homer Stryker Center, Mahwah, NJ.

*The Implant Wear Symposium 2007 Engineering Work Group included Donald L. Bartel, PhD, Thomas D. Brown, PhD, Ian C. Clarke, PhD, Roy D. Crowninshield, PhD, Darryl D’Lima, MD, PhD, A. Seth Greenwald, DPhil(Oxon), Steven M. Kurtz, PhD, Jack Lemons, PhD, Michael T. Manley, PhD, Harry A. McKellop, PhD, Orhun K. Muratoglu, PhD, Ebru Oral, PhD, Lisa Pruitt, PhD, Clare Rimnac, PhD, Peter S. Walker, PhD, and Timothy Wright, PhD.

Dr. Clarke or a member of his immediate family has received research or institutional support from Amedica, Biomet, CeramTec, Encore, Global, Smith & Nephew, Stryker, and Zimmer, and has received miscellaneous nonincome support from Biomet, Encore, and Stryker. Dr. Manley or a member of his immediate family has received research or institutional support from Stryker Orthopaedics, holds stock or stock options in Stryker, and is an employee of Stryker Orthopaedics.

Metal, ceramic, and polyethylene liners represent contemporary bearing choices for total joint replacement. Each has limitations in terms of design, sensitivity to manufacturing, and surgical placement. With polyethylene, larger femoral heads represent a design restriction and a potential wear issue. One side benefit is that polyethylene does not click, squeak, or create stripe wear. The attraction of hard-on-hard bearings (metal-on-metal, ceramic-on-ceramic) is that their typically ultra-low wear alleviates concerns with large femoral head designs. However, hard-on-hard bearings produce stripe wear due to the effects of the rigid liner edge. Slight subluxation (microseparation) during swing phase of gait can result in stripe wear on the ball and liner rim. In addition, high levels of implant wear with vertically placed cups can be anticipated. Currently, only alumina-on-alumina bearings can claim virtually no biologic risk. Thus, the role of laboratory studies is to isolate relevant aspects of performance by cup design and to predict the risk-benefit ratios in patients requiring total hip replacement.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.