HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tile, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tile, M

Acute Pelvic Fractures: II. Principles of Management

University of Toronto School of Medicine, and Surgeon-in-Chief, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto.

The past two decades have seen many advances in pelvic-trauma surgery. Provisional fixation of unstable pelvic-ring disruptions and open-book fractures with a pelvic clamp or an external frame with a supracondylar pin has proved markedly beneficial in the resuscitative phase of management. In the completely unstable pelvis, external clamps and frames can act only as provisional fixation and should be combined with skeletal traction. The traction pin is usually used only until a definitive form of stabilization can be applied to keep the pelvic ring in a reduced position. If the patient is too ill to allow operative intervention, the traction pin can remain in place with the external frame as definitive treatment. Symphyseal disruptions and medial ramus fractures should be plated at the time of laparotomy. Lateral ramus fractures can usually be controlled with external frames. A role has been suggested for percutaneous retrograde fixation of the superior pubic ramus; however, the benefits to be gained may not be enough to outweigh the serious risks of penetrating the hip, and this technique should therefore be used only by surgeons trained in its performance. The techniques for posterior fixation are becoming more standardized, but all still carry significant risks, especially to neurologic structures.