JAAOS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stanitski, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stanitski, D.

Limb-length inequality: assessment and treatment options

DF Stanitski

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA.

Assessment and treatment of limb-length inequality, particularly in the growing child, is a challenging task. Evaluation of the discrepancy requires an understanding of the significance of the disparity, as well as the natural history of the disorder, before formulation of a treatment plan. In the immature patient, consistent longitudinal data are essential to avoid pitfalls in the projection of ultimate length difference. Therapeutic options range from no treatment or use of a simple shoe lift to a surgical shortening or lengthening procedure. The current indication for lengthening is a disparity exceeding 5 to 6 cm. Epiphysiodesis or femoral shortening is useful for smaller discrepancies or for residual differences following a contralateral lengthening. Lengthening is done with a circular or cantilever external fixator, which may be combined with an intramedullary rod.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.