JAAOS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ramsey, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ramsey, M.

Distal biceps tendon injuries: diagnosis and management

ML Ramsey

University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Penn Musculoskeletal Institute, Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia 19104, USA.

Rupture of the distal biceps tendon occurs most commonly in the dominant extremity of men between 40 and 60 years of age when an unexpected extension force is applied to the flexed arm. Although previously thought to be an uncommon injury, distal biceps tendon ruptures are being reported with increasing frequency. The rupture typically occurs at the tendon insertion into the radial tuberosity in an area of preexisting tendon degeneration. The diagnosis is made on the basis of a history of a painful, tearing sensation in the antecubital region. Physical examination demonstrates a palpable and visible deformity of the distal biceps muscle belly with weakness in flexion and supination. The ability to palpate the tendon in the antecubital fossa may indicate partial tearing of the biceps tendon. Plain radiographs may show hypertrophic bone formation at the radial tuberosity. Magnetic resonance imaging is generally not required to diagnose a complete rupture but may be useful in the case of a partial rupture. Early surgical reattachment to the radial tuberosity is recommended for optimal results. A modified two-incision technique is the most widely used method of repair, but anterior single-incision techniques may be equally effective provided the radial nerve is protected. The patient with a chronic rupture may benefit from surgical reattachment, but proximal retraction and scarring of the muscle belly can make tendon mobilization difficult, and inadequate length of the distal biceps tendon may necessitate tendon augmentation. Postoperative rehabilitation must emphasize protected return of motion for the first 8 weeks after repair. Formal strengthening may begin as early as 8 weeks, with a return to unrestricted activities, including lifting, by 5 months.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. R. Freeman, K. R. McCormick, D. Mahoney, M. Baratz, and J. D. Lubahn
Nonoperative Treatment of Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures Compared with a Historical Control Group
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2009; 91(10): 2329 - 2334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page

Br. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2009; 43(3): 229 - 230.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Dirim, S. S. Brouha, M. L. Pretterklieber, K. S. Wolff, A. Frank, M. N. Pathria, and C. B. Chung
Terminal Bifurcation of the Biceps Brachii Muscle and Tendon: Anatomic Considerations and Clinical Implications
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6): W248 - W255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. King and M. Bollier
Repair of Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures Using the EndoButton
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., August 1, 2008; 16(8): 490 - 494.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
M. Kettler, M. J. Tingart, J. Lunger, and V. Kuhn
Reattachment of the distal tendon of biceps: FACTORS AFFECTING THE FAILURE STRENGTH OF THE REPAIR
J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2008; 90-B(1): 103 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
L. J. Bisson, J. G. de Perio, A. E. Weber, M. T. Ehrensberger, and C. Buyea
Is It Safe to Perform Aggressive Rehabilitation After Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Using the Modified 2-Incision Approach?: A Biomechanical Study
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2007; 35(12): 2045 - 2050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. W. O'Driscoll, L. B. J. Goncalves, and P. Dietz
The Hook Test for Distal Biceps Tendon Avulsion
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2007; 35(11): 1865 - 1869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. Kettler, J. Lunger, V. Kuhn, W. Mutschler, and M. J. Tingart
Failure Strengths in Distal Biceps Tendon Repair
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2007; 35(9): 1544 - 1548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. S. Idler, W. H. Montgomery III, D. P. Lindsey, P. A. Badua, G. F. Wynne, and S. A. Yerby
Distal Biceps Tendon Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison of Intact Tendon and 2 Repair Techniques
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2006; 34(6): 968 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. E. Lemos, E. Ebramzedeh, and R. S. Kvitne
A New Technique: In Vitro Suture Anchor Fixation Has Superior Yield Strength to Bone Tunnel Fixation for Distal Biceps Tendon Repair
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2004; 32(2): 406 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.