JAAOS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Orthop Surg, Vol 9, No 1, January/February 2001, 18-28.
© 2001 the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tornetta, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tornetta, P., III

Displaced Acetabular Fractures: Indications for Operative and Nonoperative Management

Paul Tornetta, III, MD

Dr. Tornetta is Associate Professor and Vice Chairman, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass; and Director of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedics, Boston Medical Center.

Reprint requests: Dr. Tornetta, Department of Orthopaedics, Boston Medical Center, Dowling 2 North, 818 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02118.

Displaced acetabular fractures are a challenging problem. In contradistinction to most conditions in which surgery is based on specific operative indications, displaced acetabular fractures should be considered an operative problem unless specific criteria for nonoperative management are met. These include a congruent hip joint on the anteroposterior and oblique (Judet) radiographs, an intact weight-bearing surface (as defined by roof arc and subchondral arc measurements on computed tomographic scans), and a stable joint. The final decision about the treatment method must also consider the patient’s functional demands, expectations, and physical condition and the physician’s experience and institutional support for dealing with this type of injury. Displaced both-column fractures with secondary congruence may have better results than other displaced fractures. In older patients, nonoperative management may be effectively utilized. Understanding the current criteria for effective use of nonoperative treatment will help the surgeon make these difficult decisions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. S. Issack, J. B. Toro, R. L. Buly, and D. L. Helfet
Sciatic Nerve Release Following Fracture or Reconstructive Surgery of the Acetabulum
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2007; 89(7): 1432 - 1437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
H. J. Kreder, N. Rozen, C. M. Borkhoff, Y. G. Laflamme, M. D. McKee, E. H. Schemitsch, and D. J. G. Stephen
Determinants of functional outcome after simple and complex acetabular fractures involving the posterior wall
J Bone Joint Surg Br, June 1, 2006; 88-B(6): 776 - 782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. A. Karunakar, S. N. Shah, and S. Jerabek
Body Mass Index as a Predictor of Complications After Operative Treatment of Acetabular Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2005; 87(7): 1498 - 1502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.