|
|
||||||||
Dr. McCauley is Associate Professor of Diagnostic Radiology and Chief of MRI, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. Dr. Disler is Associate Clinical Professor of Radiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, and is in private practice with Commonwealth Radiology, Richmond.
Reprint requests: Dr. McCauley, Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, Box 208042, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520-8042.
Recently developed magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques allow accurate detection of moderate- and high-grade articular cartilage defects. There has been increased interest in MR imaging of articular cartilage in part because it is useful in identifying patients who may benefit from new articular cartilage replacement therapies, including chondrocyte transplantation, improved techniques for osteochondral transplantation, chondroprotective agents, and cartilage growth stimulation factors. The modality also has the potential to play an important role in the follow-up of patients during and after treatment. Detection of articular cartilage defects is beneficial for patients undergoing arthroscopy for other injuries, such as meniscal tears, because the presence of articular cartilage injury worsens prognosis and may modify therapy options.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. K. Shindle, L. F. Foo, B. T. Kelly, A. J. Khanna, B. G. Domb, A. Farber, T. Wanich, and H. G. Potter Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cartilage in the Athlete: Current Techniques and Spectrum of Disease J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2006; 88(suppl_4): 27 - 46. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Graichen, D Al-Shamari, S Hinterwimmer, R von Eisenhart-Rothe, T Vogl, and F Eckstein Accuracy of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of ex vivo focal cartilage defects Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 2005; 64(8): 1120 - 1125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Masi, C. A. Sell, C. Phan, E. Han, D. Newitt, L. Steinbach, S. Majumdar, and T. M. Link Cartilage MR Imaging at 3.0 versus That at 1.5 T: Preliminary Results in a Porcine Model Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 140 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Vasanawala, B. A. Hargreaves, J. M. Pauly, D. G. Nishimura, C. F. Beaulieu, and G. E. Gold Rapid Musculoskeletal MRI with Phase-Sensitive Steady-State Free Precession: Comparison with Routine Knee MRI Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1450 - 1455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Alford and B. J. Cole Cartilage Restoration, Part 1: Basic Science, Historical Perspective, Patient Evaluation, and Treatment Options Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2005; 33(2): 295 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Beaule, E. Zaragoza, and N. Copelan Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Gadolinium Arthrography to Assess Acetabular Cartilage Delamination. A Report of Four Cases J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2004; 86(10): 2294 - 2298. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. Gold, T. R. McCauley, M. L. Gray, and D. G. Disler Special Focus Session: What's New in Cartilage? RadioGraphics, September 1, 2003; 23(5): 1227 - 1242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Link, L. S. Steinbach, S. Ghosh, M. Ries, Y. Lu, N. Lane, and S. Majumdar Osteoarthritis: MR Imaging Findings in Different Stages of Disease and Correlation with Clinical Findings Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 373 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |